The Diplomatic Break between Panama and the United States in 1964
In 1964, a significant turning point in Panamanian history occurred when the country cut diplomatic ties with the United States. This action was rooted in longstanding grievances over U.S. control of the Panama Canal and increased nationalism among Panamanians. The decision to sever relations was a culmination of growing discontent that had been simmering for decades.
Background of the Panama Canal and U.S.-Panama Relations
The Panama Canal, completed in 1914, was a vital waterway that allowed ships to save time and distance when traveling between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. However, the construction and subsequent management of the canal were dominated by the United States, which effectively controlled the Canal Zone—an area selected by the U.S. government in 1903 following Panama's independence from Colombia. The Panamanian populace grew increasingly frustrated with this arrangement, feeling that their sovereignty was being undermined by foreign powers.
Incidents Leading to the Break
In January 1964, tensions escalated when a series of incidents involving schoolchildren and U.S. military personnel in the Canal Zone led to riots. These gatherings displayed a heightened sense of nationalism, eventually spiraling into widespread violence, which resulted in deaths and injuries on both sides. This unrest solidified the belief among Panamanians that a change was necessary, leading to the historic decision to end diplomatic relations.
Consequences of the Diplomatic Break
The severing of diplomatic ties was a critical moment in Panama's history. It sparked international attention and discussions on the control of the Panama Canal and the rights of Panamanians. The break not only strained relations but also fueled further negotiations about the future management of the canal, culminating in the Torrijos-Carter Treaties signed in 1977, which aimed to gradually transfer control of the canal to Panama.
Political Impact in Panama
This diplomatic break increased support for Panamanian leaders who advocated for greater sovereignty over national resources. It empowered voices within the government and the public, catalyzing political movements aimed at reclaiming authority from foreign influence.
Global Reaction to Panama's Decision
The international response to Panama's decision was mixed, with some nations supporting Panama's stance to reclaim sovereignty while others backed the U.S. actions. This moment was pivotal for the broader movement across Latin America that sought independence from imperialistic influences.
Fun Fact
Did You Know About the 1964 Break?
The hiatus in diplomatic relations lasted almost a decade, as Panama sought to emphasize its right to self-determination and the importance of the canal to its national identity.
Additional Resources
Recommended Reading on Panama's Diplomatic Relations
If you're interested in learning more about this pivotal moment in history, consider reading The Panama Canal: A History and a Memoir by William Howard Taft and In the Time of Our History by Rodolfo Serrano. These books delve deeper into the complexities of Panama's historical relationship with the U.S.