The Election of Athanasius as Patriarch Bishop of Alexandria

Understanding Athanasius of Alexandria

Athanasius of Alexandria, an influential figure in early Christianity, was elected as the Patriarch Bishop of Alexandria in 328 AD. His leadership would ultimately shape Christian doctrine and opposition to Arianism, a significant heretical movement at that time. The background surrounding his rise and the implications of his election reveal insights into the religious and political dynamics of the early church.

Athanasius – A Strategic Thinker and Leader

Athanasius was born in c. 296 AD in Alexandria, which was a bustling center of culture and intellectual thought. From a young age, he was recognized for his theological insight and ability to articulate complex ideas, which made him a valuable asset to the church. His election as Patriarch bishop reflected both his personal convictions and the needs of the Christian community amidst the turbulent theological disputes prevalent at the time.

The Context of Athanasius’s Election

The election of Athanasius came during a pivotal moment in Christian history when the Church was grappling with divisions regarding the nature of Christ. Arianism, propagated by Arius, challenged the divinity of Christ, consequently causing significant controversy and discord within Christianity. Athanasius emerged as a staunch opponent of these teachings, striving to safeguard the doctrine of the Trinity and the full divinity of Christ as advocated by the Nicene Creed.

The Impact of Athanasius’s Leadership

Athanasius's tenure as Patriarch had profound implications for the Church and its followers. His writings, including the famous treatise On the Incarnation, solidified the theological groundwork for future Christian thought and established him as one of the key defenders of orthodoxy.

Athanasius's Exile and Return

During his leadership, Athanasius faced significant opposition, which led to multiple periods of exile. However, these challenges did not deter him from his mission; instead, they highlighted his resilience and commitment to his faith. Each time he returned, he rallied the supporters of orthodox teachings, reinforcing his status as a pivotal figure within the church.